1.05.2010

Clemson has an Institute for the (honest) Study of Capitalism!

Today I received the following email from the Ayn Rand Center for Individual Rights:

Atlas Shrugged on Stossel

Dear ARI Contributor:

The Ayn Rand Center is excited to announce that Atlas Shrugged, Ayn Rand’s magnum opus, will be the subject of the Thursday, January 7, edition of Stossel on the Fox Business Network.

The program airs at 8 p.m., eastern time, and features interviews with leading Objectivist intellectuals including Yaron Brook, president of the Ayn Rand Center, John Allison, chairman of BB&T Corp., and C. Bradley Thompson, executive director of the Clemson Institute for the Study of Capitalism.

If you’re not able to view the upcoming airing, please check your local listing for a possible rebroadcast.

ARC Media

Whoa, whoa, wait, the Clemson what?

The Clemson Institute for the Study of Capitalism

Wow! How did I not know about this? Oh well, I'm glad that I do now. It turns out they have a weekly seminar for students and people in the area and they have conferences throughout the year. I'm going to make it to one of those and I'm also going to donate to the cause. Complete Laissez-Faire Capitalism is the only moral system of government and I want to do whatever I can to further that cause, and I am absolutely thrilled that Clemson has a group that is carrying the torch! GO TIGERS!!!

For those that want to join me in making a charitable contribution:

Any kind gift contribution is greatly appreciated!!
Checks should be made out to "Clemson University Foundation." The Memo line can be made out to the "Clemson Institute for the Study of Capitalism."
The check should be mailed to:

Brad Thompson
Clemson Institute for the Study of Capitalism
325 Sirrine Hall
Clemson University
Clemson, South Carolina
29634


Labels: ,

12.06.2009

Clemson Football Season Wrapup

Well, last night Clemson lost to GA Tech 39 to 34 in the ACC Championship. The game was actually a lot more lopsided than the final score as Tech's offense basically had their way with us all night while our offense either sputtered and went nowhere or scored on a quick play. I wouldn't want to take back every quick point we scored but the fact is you have to keep your offense on the field and Tech's off the field if you want to win the game. So if we score quickly on one drive, we have to either score quickly on the next drive or at least put together a couple of first downs.

Instead, we were inconsistent with a few big plays mixed in, just like we have been all year. Only this time, our incredible pass defense was mismatched with an incredible running team. I was disheartened to see that our Defense didn't take the lesson we had learned in the first matchup with GT this year: have the ends play the QB. Instead our ends would crash the inside trying to take the dive, and Nesbit would pop to the outside and be off to the races. He's deadly on the outside but ineffective if you keep him contained. We didn't do that. We did come back in the fourth quarter though and we even had a chance to win it on the last drive, but yet again this season our two minute offense looked like a bunch of beheaded chickens and we totally flubbed that opportunity.

The worst part about the loss was the inconsistent play of the offense, and it was made even worse by the comments made by Dabo Swinney. In his post game presser, Swinney said:
“They really didn’t stop us either; again, we ran out of time,” Swinney said. “Certainly when you can’t stop them, it’s hard to win. They made some critical plays, 4th down, 3rd down. Hard to win. Time of possession had to be way out of whack. Again, I wouldn’t say they stopped us. It was a shootout, but unfortunately we just couldn’t get the ball enough. And then we had a couple of turnovers on offense that allowed them to get a couple of extra possessions in there.”
However, this is factually not the case. The truth of the matter is that we only stopped them on one drive, while they stopped us on four, with two of those being interceptions. Additionally, Swinney is insinuating here that his shoddy offense deserves no blame and that the defense was the cause of the loss.

This is very Tommy Bowden-esque, but what should we expect? Swinney was hand-picked by Bowden, after all. Defensive Coordinator Kevin Steele told reporters that his defense was to blame and that we would have won if we could have just stopped their offense. This is the difference in the two men: Steele is a good coach who takes responsibility; Swinney is a rookie who is in over his head and looking for a way to save his ass. It was reported during the game that Swinney told the defense that if we couldn't stop Tech's last drive then we didn't deserve to win the championship. The nerve of Swinney to say something like that to our defense after our offense kept them on the field all night. Well he was half right: we didn't deserve to win the championship, but it was because we hired a WR coach to lead our team.

This sums up the entire season really. We played a horrible schedule and fell into the ACC Championship game. We lost to any decent team we played and even to a couple of horrible ones. Here we are with another disappointing season and another disappointing bowl. I was optimistic that things had changed with Dabo but I was wrong. I should have known the minute he decided that Napier would be the OC that the mediocrity was going to continue. Dabo and his buddies are having a good time and nothing has changed, we're still the Bowdenesque Tigers of mediocrity, sitting on the sidelines while teams who hire good coaches are actually going somewhere.

Labels: ,

11.28.2009

South Carolina Wrap Up

Today Clemson got shocked in Columbia and fell to the Gamecocks 34-17.

I was completely caught off guard by the way we played today. It reminded me of last year's Nebraska debacle, only worse. The game started out great, just like I expected. CJ Spiller had a kickoff return for a touchdown, SC got the ball and Garcia threw an interception, and our offense went on the attack. We were marching right down the field using the intermediate passing game, exploiting the middle of the field...

And then, the ghost of Rob Spence reared his ugly head. I really just don't know what happened, it's like someone hit a switch and Billy Napier reverted back to Fun 'N Punt mode. We ran a fake reverse pass that of course didn't come close to working and it completely destroyed any sort of rythm that we had. That was the turning point in the game, early in the first quarter. Yes, we got a first down out of it because of a late hit, but that play signaled to our players that our coaches are fools and signaled to Steve Spurrier that he was up against an offensive coordinator who had no clue what he was doing.

The rest is history. Screens, pitch outs, receiver tunnel screens, reverses, and no production. Our offense laid a giant egg out there against a decent defense but definitely nothing top-25 worthy. It was almost like we were trying to make them look like world beaters, doing everything left and right, but nothing up the damn field.

Meanwhile, Spurrier noticed that the one pass his QB threw over the middle got intercepted, so he started picking on our corners, especially Chancellor. We didn't adjust to this until the second half, and SC was able to use a mixture of passes to the outside and running to run up the score.

I was starting to think that Napier had learned his lessons this year and was growing as an offensive coordinator but this game proved me completely wrong. Our offensive coaching staff is a huge problem for our team and something needs to be done. I like Dabo as the head coach and I like our defense, but our offense hasn't changed since the days of the Tommy Bowden Fun 'N Punt.

Labels: ,

10.24.2009

Miami Wrapup

Clemson just beat Miami 40-37 in overtime. I don't know what in the world happened in this game. Our defense looked like they had swine flu. Our offense played pretty well, with the exception of Parker's panic fumble. Our coaches proved once again that they are rookies learning on the job. The game management of the last two minutes was amateurish. I haven't seen clock management that bad since Tommy West. When you hire rookies... At least we won. Hopefully our coaches can learn from their mistakes.

CJ Spiller is definitely the MVP of this team. I still can't wait until Harper and Ellington are running the ball. Hopefully we'll get a receiver to make up for Spiller's ability there.

Labels: ,

10.18.2009

Wake Wrapup

Clemson beat Wake Forest 38-3 this weekend in a game that turned out exactly like it should have given the makeup of the two teams. Unfortunately for Clemson, it took a loss to an extremely poor team (Maryland) to get the coaches fired up enough to make the routine game look routine. The defense played like they have all year, but the offense came out inspired and basically dominated Wake all day. There were two differences this week that made the performance possible:

1) The receivers actually caught the ball. It's amazing how great the offensive line and the quarterback look when the receivers actually make the catch. Last game "the OL sucks!" but now they're awesome, only nothing they did changed. Wake's defense wasn't able to play us tight and our drives didn't end on third down and it was all for the simple reason that we actually caught the ball this week.

2) The Tight End was used as an integral part of the passing game. We have thrown to the tight end a few times this year but in this game it was obvious that we were trying to get him the ball. The reason this is so important is that it forces the linebackers to respect the passing game, which makes running the ball that much easier. Also the tight end is a good target because he's usually bigger than the defensive backs and they usually catch the ball (although not always.)

That's really it. It wasn't some magical improvement in the blocking or in the running game or in the quarterback or in the playcalling. It was the simple fact that we caught the damn ball. Amazing how that works.

Some other notes:
- CJ Spiller has got to get the ball upfield faster. He simply dances too much. By the time he was able to make his long 60+ yard TD run we already had Wake's defense on their heels and the line opened up such a huge hole that even CJ had time to get there.
- CJ Spiller is simply an amazing open field runner. We need to put him in a position where he can get the ball in the open field instead of taking handoffs.
- Kyle Parker is still hesitating in the passing game. He makes the throw just a split second too late but luckily he has the arm strength to still deliver the ball.
- Korn throws late, slow, and low. Glad he's only in the game when it's over.
- I really like the attitude of our Defense, especially how our DB's go for the ball instead of going for the hit.

One last thing: our offensive coaching staff should be fired ASAP. This game proves that we have the talent to dominate the ACC on the offensive side of the ball. The loss to Maryland shows that we do not properly coach that talent to utilize their skills. There is simply no excuse for the difference in performance between the Maryland game and the Wake game, and we need to bring in a real Offensive Coordinator (and whatever support staff he wants) so that this doesn't happen again. If we don't, we will be doomed to repeat our recent history.

Labels: ,

10.15.2009

Some College Football Picks

I haven't been writing much lately about politics or anything other than football and it looks like that trend is going to continue. One of these days I'll get back to the American Fascism series detailing how much control the government has over our lives but for now I'm going to stay on the positive side and talk about something I like: football.

So here are some quick picks for this weekend's games:

Clemson vs Wake Forrest: Clemson
Dabo Swinney is turning out to be Tommy 2.0 and just like Tommy I expect him to pull out a big win when his ass is on the hot seat. I don't know the line on this game, but I doubt Clemson is favored.

Texas vs Oklahoma: Texas
The line is 3.5 at this point and Texas will cover. Oklahoma is just not that good, even with Sam Bradford. Also this is the Big Offense league so I doubt the game will have a difference of a field goal.

Florida vs Arkansas: Arkansas
Florida is going to beat Arkansas, but the line is a ridiculous 25 points right now. If there's one thing Arkansas can do, it is score touchdowns. They may lose by 14, but I seriously doubt they lose by 25.

Virginia Tech vs Georgia Tech: Virginia Tech
As much as I like Paul Johnson and his option offense, he does not have a bona fide option quarterback at this point. Nesbit is a great athlete but he does not make the right reads. In fact, you can tell when you watch them play that he is actually pre-determining his reads before the snap instead of reading the defensive end like he's supposed to. Bud Foster will stop this easily, and Virginia Tech will cover the 3 point spread against the soft Georgia Tech defense.

Alabama vs South Carolina: ???
Alabama is giving up 17 to South Carolina and while I know Alabama will win, I have no clue by what margin. SC is not a good team but if they were playing in Columbia I would have to say Alabama won't cover. However this game is at Alabama and so there's no upside down cockroach to save them.

Labels: ,

10.06.2009

Maryland Reaction

Clemson lost to Maryland this past saturday 24-21. I sat down last night to watch my recording of the game so that I could dissect everything that happened, but I just couldn't bring myself to do it. After watching the first quarter of the game, I saw all that I needed to see.

As I said in my writeup of the TCU game, this team suffers from a lack of experience and/or talent in the offensive coaching staff. We didn't improve on any of the problems I listed, and we continued to look lost and panicked on the offensive side of the ball. This week, our defense didn't save us, and so we lost an embarrassing game to a pitiful team.

Clemson should have never hired Dabo Swinney without stipulating that he bring in a new offensive coordinator with a new offensive coaching staff. There are some who argue that they didn't even look for any other coaches, and that Dabo had the job from day one. Whatever the case, we have not rid ourselves of the scourge that is Tommy Bowden football. Inconsistent offense, shaky special teams, and good defense. We've got the same thing now that we've had for the last 10 years. This is not going to change under the current coaching staff.

So what should we do? Well it's simple, we need Dabo to remove himself from calling plays and we need a real offensive coordinator. If we can't do this right now, then we need to put Brad Scott in charge of the offense until the end of the year, then bring in a completely new offensive coaching staff. Brad Scott might even work for the long term, he was a great offensive coordinator at Florida State and he had some success here at Clemson before being thrown under the bus by Tommy Bowden.

I think Dabo is a great guy and will be a great head coach, but he needs to clean house on the offensive side of the ball and bring in some real coaches. Our plays develop too slowly, we never run basic routes like quick slants or TE curls, our receivers can't block, catch, or run routes, etc, etc. These problems all point to bad coaching, and we have to fix that now or by the end of the year Dabo won't have a job.

Labels: ,

9.27.2009

TCU Wrapup

Well it was another rainy weekend in Clemson and another close loss as the Tigers went down to TCU 14-10. Just as I predicted before the season, we were one big special teams play away from the victory. The defense put up a great effort and if it wasn't for a fluke reception we may have held the offensive "powerhouse" to just 7 points. Unfortunately the offense didn't help out any and here are a few of the problems I think we continue to show on that side of the ball:

1) Receiving – we can’t catch and we can’t run routes. Ford, our best receiver, dropped a sure first down on the first drive of the game that foreshadowed things to come. He would have had an easier time catching it if he had just run a crisp route, but still, he should have caught it.

2) Rushing – our running plays develop too slowly and our runningbacks hesitate to hit the hole. This may work out from time to time for a big play but whenever the D stiffens up (red zone, 3rd and short, etc) it results in no gain.

3) Game Management – Our defense was one fluke catch away from a shutout when we decided to go for it on 4th down. Makes no sense, especially when we can’t run worth shit. Punt the damn ball and play D. Also, let’s not even mention the last minute of the game.

4) Quarterback – While Parker did a great job and made some great throws in bad conditions, he also showed a tendency to drift to the right side of the field. I’m glad that he steps up in the pocket and looks downfield instead of drifting out the back, but after that he should either throw the ball or tuck and run. Drifting to the right takes away half of the receivers and turns 2nd and 5 or less into 2nd and 10. The one exception would be a desperation situation like our second to last possession.

These problems stem from an inexperienced offensive coaching staff. I still think our biggest mistake as a program was not hiring an experienced offensive coordinator. I'm sure Napier is a good buddy and a great guy, but that doesn't mean he should have been hired as OC when we have such an inexperienced head coach. The vacuum on that side of the ball is clearly evident.

That being said, here are a few things I think we should do in order to improve the offense:

1) Route Running drills - After practice conditioning for receivers should be route running drills. They should have to run them perfectly or get back in line and run them again. This should progress through at least 10 different routes, 3 times each.

2) Ball Catching drills - Texas Tech uses tennis balls. Jerry Rice used bricks. Either way, let's come up with some catching drills that will get our guys to focus on the damn ball. Running better routes will make catching easier, but catching drills will attack the problem directly. Also we should institute practice rules like they do in the pro's, where if you drop a pass you pay a penalty. In college, that penalty can be several things: gassers, more study time, extra weights time, stadium steps, etc.

3) Running Play Construction - Our coaches need to go back to the drawing board when it comes to most of our running plays, and some passing plays need to be re-considered for inclusion. For running plays, I love the fact that we're using the fullback more often, but we need to get the RB to the hole much faster and this involves where the RBs line up, where they take the handoff, and their run progression. In case this isn't it already, our RBs should be coached on the following run progression: 1) take the handoff, 2) hit the hole, 3) make one cut (if needed), 4) run your landmarks (hash, numbers, sideline). This should be reinforced in the film room by showing how plays have opened up in actual games only to be shut down before the ball is advanced, and it should be reinforced in practice by using the non-contact periods to practice timing.

4) Pass Play Construction - We completely neglect the quick-hitting upfield passing game. We have the fastest receiver in the nation (Ford) and yet he's only caught one quick slant in his career (last year vs Nebraska.) The success of that one play should have shown the coaches something they should incorporate in the gameplan each week. We need to include the plays that get the ball upfield and get it upfield fast. Screens have been used sparingly this year and that trend should continue. The tight end has been used sparingly this year and that trend should be reversed. We have a young quarterback with receivers that are letting him down: make the tight end the second receiver in the progression, he presents an easy target for the QB and he attacks the middle of the coverage, usually a weak spot.

5) Quarterback Progression - We need to get Kyle Parker to make a decision after he's stepped up into the pocket: run or pass. He is doing a great job of making his drops, scanning the field, then stepping up into the pocket (instead of drifting out of the back.) Now we need him to either deliver the ball or to pick up a quick 5 yards if nobody is in front of him. I love his ability to keep the play alive, but we need to keep drives alive and our current habit of having the QB slide out to the right side is just not getting it done.

I'm sure there's more but that's all I can think of right now. Overall I think we have a good team and we have a lot to be excited about. We should drum a terrible Maryland team this week and use our off week to whip our offense into shape. Considering the weakness of our schedule coming up (with the possible exception of Miami, although I think VT showed how weak they are when faced with a good defense) we are in position to win our division and face VT in the conference championship. There is no reason this team shouldn't be able to accomplish this, it just depends on our offensive coaching staff.

Labels: ,

9.20.2009

Boston College Wrapup

The Tigers beat Boston College 25-7 yesterday in the longest football game in Clemson Football history. CJ Spiller had the only Tiger touchdown on the day with a long punt return and Richard Jackson scored the bulk of the points on 6 field goals including a long 52 yarder. The real story of the day was the Clemson defense which absolutely dominated the Eagles and held them to 55 yards. If our offense had managed to do anything noteworthy, the defensive numbers may have been even more staggering.

Unfortunately our offense was eerily reminiscent of Tommy Bowden run teams, with the exception of the use of the fullback. We seemed quick to abandon the fundamentals and our playcalling seemed panicked and gimmick-filled. When our quarterback started out a little shaky, we pulled him in favor of the fan-favorite backup. When our receivers dropped a few passes, we started running screens and junk plays. We showed in our third game of the year that we have a very inexperienced head coach and an even more inexperienced offensive coordinator.

Some other noteworthy events happened this week in the ACC, mainly Miami dominated Georgia Tech and Florida State dominated BYU. Both of these games mean that I may have underestimated Miami and FSU in my pre-season prediction. Then again, Miami did face a bad pass defense in GT as well as a complete lack of a pass rush due to Tech trying their all-star defensive end out at linebacker for some reason. FSU was a complete surprise but they were playing a bunch of slow Mormons after all.

If we can't turn it around on offense, we're not going to beat Miami or FSU, and our season will go from pretty good to pretty mediocre. We seemed to have something going against Georgia Tech in the second half, so maybe we just need our coaches to pretend like we're behind in every game and they'll call aggressive plays that stretch the defense. Our defense is very good against the pass so we'll be able to stop both Miami and FSU on a lot of drives, but without any offensive production of our own the sheer speed of those two teams will beat us.

Here's to hoping we have a turnaround game with TCU. Our offense needs to play very well if we want to win this game. Our defense just can't do everything for us, and if punting is our best offensive play again this week then this game is going to seem even longer.

Labels: ,

9.10.2009

Georgia Tech Wrapup

The game clock just ran out but this Tiger football team is just getting started. I was very impressed by what I saw tonight even though we had a lot of lame-brained mistakes. We started out the game by blowing two offensive opportunities, allowing a big triple option touchdown, allowing a punt return for a touchdown off a blown pooch kick, and allowing a fake punt pass for a touchdown. After that the Tigers locked down Paul Johnson and the triple option, and held Tech to only 3 more points until the last minute of the contest.

Kyle Parker continued to show that he has what it takes to be a great quarterback. The Tiger defense continued to aggressively go after the ball and came up with some big interceptions. Most encouragingly, we made some big time adjustments and went on a 24 unanswered point streak. That is something we never did under the previous coaching staff. Overall we did better in this game than I thought we would and we even spotted Georgia Tech 14 points in the first quarter. Such is to be expected with a young team and a young coach.

The sad thing about this game is that the outcome was radically changed by an officiating mistake. Yes, Clemson made plenty of mistakes and those are the main reason we lost: you take away the 14 points from special teams errors and we win the game by 11. However, that doesn't change the fact that the referee called a holding penalty on an offensive lineman that used correct blocking technique which resulted in the reversal of a long pass play that put the Tigers in field goal range. Our lineman had both of his hands inside, on the numbers, just like you're supposed to. He drove the defensive lineman to the inside towards his teammates like you're supposed to do. The defender fell down as he was being blocked. There was no illegal blocking there and the holding penalty was incorrect.

There is no guarantee that if you take away that bogus penalty with 3 minutes left in the game that Clemson would have won the game. We could have fumbled on the next play, who knows. That still doesn't change the fact that the last 3 minutes of the game were played out differently than they should have been because of a terrible officiating mistake. In such a hard fought game, with one team coming back from such a deficit, it is unacceptable that such poor officiating alters the results of the players on the field.

The great thing is that our coaches and our players showed that they have character: if they get down early, they can make adjustments, find the other guy's weaknesses, and fight back. This is something we haven't seen around Clemson in a long time. Also, our defense showed that it can completely shut down a powerful offense. We will face tougher passing tests this year, but we probably won't face a team that's better at running the ball than we faced tonight, and after a few missteps in the first quarter we completely locked them down for a good 45 minutes. Another positive is that even though we had another boneheaded tipped pass on offense (caused an interception) we had some guys step up and make tough catches and make big passing plays. This is only game 2 and we are showing that we have some seriously dangerous quick strike weapons and we have a quarterback that can get them the damn ball. We have a lot of positives going for us coming out of this close loss.

Some quick notes:

  • Rendrick Taylor, I'm sorry about what I said in my last post, that was some amazing blocking tonight. I just hope you can realize how much of a beast you are and hit people like that when you're holding the ball.
  • Dabo, please don't use the field goal pooch kick any more. It's cool if you have a smart kicker, but obviously we do not.
  • Also, please don't run a trap on 3rd and 1 in a critical situation, especially against a good defensive line. The pulling guard always gets blown up into the backfield and disrupts the play, and against a good defense it just won't work, so stop it.
  • I counted 4 junk plays tonight. That's 4 too many in my book, but still much better than Bowden (reverse, tunnel screen, and two shotgun options I think)


In conclusion, the Tigers played a lot better tonight than I thought we would. We put together some great drives and we had some great quick strikes. We still had some costly drops, but our offense as a whole really showed some great signs. Unfortunately, just as I predicted, we needed a special teams big play to get the win tonight and we just didn't get one. In fact we got two in reverse, both going for touchdowns for the bad guys. Our defense played much better against the triple option than I thought they would and our team played their hearts out and battled back in the face of seemingly unsurmountable odds. This is going to be a great year for Tiger football and if Dabo learns from his mistakes then we might even get a rematch with these guys at year's end.

Labels: ,

9.07.2009

Clemson Football 2009 Season Prediction

I know what you're thinking... it's a little late to do a prediction, football season started Saturday... well, I'm throwing a change-up. It wouldn't make sense to do any sort of predicting before seeing the first game of the year seeing as we have a new coaching staff and a lot of new faces on the field. Now that I've gotten a chance to see how the team is going to react in an actual game situation I think I have a good idea of how this year may pan out.

First let me just say a few things about the win against Middle Tennessee. Watching this game was a refreshing experience (aside from the rain and humidity of the second half.) Having been to the Gator Bowl last year and suffered through that debacle, I really didn't know what to expect this year at all. Saturday some of my fears were put to rest and I saw some really positive things. Most importantly, we have a quarterback. We have a bona fide team leader, an athlete that commands the game, Kyle Parker. This guy was extremely impressive in his first ever college football game. He had great poise in the pocket, he showed the ability to move around to get extra time without panicking, and he even took off for a few nice gains using his feet. When he threw the ball, he used the right speed and touch to deliver the passes appropriately for the situation. Unlike our last 4 quarterbacks, he didn't drift backwards out of the pocket. (This has been a big problem for a while, and one of the reasons less astute observers have blamed the offensive line for our woes.) We've still got to see how Parker reacts against adversity and against a better defense, but he showed he has what it takes to really get the job done. I think the best thing about seeing Parker perform was knowing that if Tommy Bowden was our coach Parker would be on the bench. Now that we're free of coaching through ego and hype we can make adjustments to get the best team on the field and hopefully win games.

Offensively we showed that we are a team with a new coach and a new quarterback. I was relieved that the playcalling wasn't as atrocious as last year, but I was unnerved at the lack of execution shown by our more veteran players. Unlike the Gator Bowl, I think we only ran two "junk" plays (bubble screens, reverses, etc) and in fact we used a lot of traditional formations (a fullback even) and fundamental play calls. We saw a lot of pass plays that were designed to move the ball upfield instead of east and west. It was great to see an offensive strategy that revolved around running the ball and keeping the defense honest by attacking them through the air. If our receivers had caught the ball more often (Parker suffered a Willie Simmons-like fate in the first quarter) we may have developed more rhythm. When we get our feet under us we should have a pretty solid offense. Some other quick thoughts:
  • Willy Korn is a bust. Kind of like Barack Obama, he was billed as the Messiah, but he sucks. I hope to see him holding a clipboard and wearing a hat for the rest of his Clemson career.

  • Rendrick Taylor needs to be a possession receiver or try something on defense. He runs like a 250 pound castle of cards. He looks like he's going to hit the hole and tear up the defense, but as soon as a slight gust of wind hits him he goes straight to the ground.

  • CJ Spiller is a tremendous athlete but I hope we see more of Jamie Harper in the backfield. He's an actual runningback.

Defensively I was very impressed. We allowed one scoring drive at the start of the second half but in all fairness we did have some of the second stringers in at that point (the defensive front especially.) What I liked the most was how we went after the ball aggressively instead of sitting back and keeping the receivers in front of us. We got pressure through the front four and some blitzing and our defensive backs capitalized on that by going after the ball and getting interceptions. Again it was a refreshing change of pace. We need to improve against the run, we were still a little soft up front, but we looked pretty good overall.

Special teams play was excellent. Again we have to remember that the opponent was not very talented, but still it was great to see Spiller and Ford score on kick returns. If we can get good return yardage all year it will really help out our offense which is presently the weakest part of the team. A kick return for a touchdown in a big game will probably mean the difference for us this year as we aren't just going to over power any respectable team on offense.

OK, so how is this going to translate into the rest of the year? Well, here is what I think:

Thu, Sep 10 at Georgia Tech - Loss
Paul Johnson showed last year that he's a great coach and he is turning Georgia Tech into a powerhouse. We are not ready for this challenge yet. Our offense can generate points and big plays but we are not consistent enough yet to face Georgia Tech. They are going to run that triple option until we're blue in the face and our defense is going to be worn out. If our offense could chew up the clock and put together long drives then we might have a chance. Unfortunately, we do not. Georgia Tech Wins.

Sat, Sep 19 Boston College - Win
BC had an impressive score in their opener, but I still don't think they are a good team without Matt Ryan. With the extra couple of days from the GT game our offense will hopefully start to find its rhythm and will come out swinging against BC.

Sat, Sep 26 TCU - Loss
This is going to be our most important regular season game. TCU is going to come into this game with a chip on their shoulder. Their coach is already saying that they are out to prove that the BCS was wrong for snubbing them last year, so supposedly they think they're going to have a BCS caliber record at the end of the year. This is a game that will be a turning point for our guys. If we go out and put TCU in their place and come up with a big win, it could turn this season into something special. If not, we can still salvage a good year and an appearance in the ACC title game. I think our offense is going to come together by this point but I just don't think we're ready for a challenge this big. TCU, despite getting no respect, is a good football team. If we get a couple of big plays on special teams we could pull the upset, but I just don't think we're there yet.

Sat, Oct 3 at Maryland - Win
Maryland showed us against Cal that they are just a weak team. We should win this game easily. We might start slow because of the big game the previous weekend, but hopefully that won't bite us.

Sat, Oct 17 Wake Forest - Win
Another weak ACC opponent. No reason this game shouldn't be a snooze fest. This game should be over by half time.

Sat, Oct 24 at Miami - Win
Miami has some running backs this year, and that scares me. They will have a good defense simply because they always do. Their problems at quarterback will bite them though and I think our defense will come up big with some turnovers. Should be a close game, but I think we will win.

Sat, Oct 31 Coastal Carolina - Win
As a fan it may be disappointing that this game is so late in the season. Fans want every home game to be a big thriller against a big team that will get us on the headlines of Sports Center. I can see why, I mean our campus is amazing on the day of a big game. I really can't think of anywhere I'd rather be. That being said, this is a great opponent to have at this juncture in our schedule. We will use this as an opportunity to heal up some injuries, get some younger guys some snaps, and try and get our legs back under us for the following weekend.

Sat, Nov 7 Florida State - Win
If this game was at Florida State it might be a different story. It's not though. FSU is better than they were last year but they're still no powerhouse. Bobby used to win on speed alone and that just doesn't work any more.

Sat, Nov 14 at North Carolina State - Win
NC State is really going to have to turn things around if they are going to challenge us this year. Their offense was totally inept against SC and their defense wasn't much better. At this point we will be rolling along. The only problem I can see going into this game is that me might have a let-down game after FSU.

Sat, Nov 21 Virginia - Win
Oh how the mighty have fallen. Just a few short years ago Virginia was an NFL talent producing mega-power (or so we were told) and now they are losing to FCS teams. Ouch.

Sat, Nov 28 at South Carolina - Win
If my predictions have been right up to this point (which is a big if) then there is no way in hell we're letting those craptastic cocks ruin our great season. In fact if our offense is hitting on all cylinders then this is going to be a blowout the likes of 63-17 and SC will send yet another college legend to the coaching graveyard. Actually I don't even think it will take a blowout: Steve Spurrier is done after this year, mark it down.


That brings our tally to 10-2 with losses against Georgia Tech and TCU. Injuries or suspensions could change this outlook completely, but at this point I think we have an easy enough schedule and the right amount of talent and coaching to get a ten win season. This could propel us into the ACC championship game where we'll face either GT or VT and I think we will lose. That will still be a great year though and especially good for a first year head coach and first year quarterback. Florida State and Miami are both dangerous opponents that could easily take away one of those wins, but on the flip side, we could scare the daylights out of TCU in Death Valley and come up with some big plays and pull of a major upset, which could possibly propel us to even greater heights.

Even though I'm not sold on Dabo just yet, if our first game is any indication of the type of playcalling we're going to see all year, I really do see us having a 10 win season. If he slips back into trick play Bowden mode then it might be really ugly and hard to watch (like the Gator Bowl) but here's to hoping that doesn't happen. Maybe we'll get another shot at the Gator Bowl this year and make up for last year's performance!

Labels: ,

8.08.2009

Clemson Wasted James Davis

Every time I read an article like this, it makes me even more angry at how the Clemson Administration runs the football team. If they would have canned Tommy Bowden when they should have, we might have been able to fully utilize the talents of Mr. Davis, and he would have been a first rounder with a really big signing bonus.

He's already turning heads in the NFL which comes as no surprise to anyone who watched him play, but he's going to have to climb the ladder the hard way instead of being a franchise player directly from the start.

Labels: ,

1.13.2009

Oh No Dabo!


Clemson Head Coach Dabo Swinney today announced the full coaching staff for his first full season. As you may have guessed, I'm less than thrilled.

Clemson Football Staff Assignments for 2009 Season

Head Coach: Dabo Swinney

Offensive Assistants
Billy Napier - Offensive Coordinator, Quarterbacks
Danny Pearman - Assistant Head Coach, Tackles, Tight Ends
Andre' Powell - Running Backs, Special Teams Coordinator
Brad Scott - Associate Head Coach, Offensive Guards and Centers
Jeff Scott - Wide Receivers

Defensive Assistants
David Blackwell - Defensive Tackles
Charlie Harbison - Co-Defensive Coordinator, Defensive Backs
Chris Rumph - Defensive Ends
Kevin Steele - Defensive Coordinator, Inside Linebackers


In all honesty the defensive staff looks pretty solid. No complaints from me there. I thought Blackwell did an outstanding job in the Gator bowl against a great offense with absolutely zero assistance from our own offense. Everything I've seen about Steele is that he's a great coordinator and we should expect a hard-nosed, dominating defense out of him, so I'm really looking forward to that.

However, that's where the positives stop. First of all, do you notice something missing from that list? Here's a clue, it's something other than offense that we've sucked at for the last two decades... Special Teams. That's right, we still don't have a dedicated special teams coordinator. Instead we have a running backs coach who also, in his spare time, coaches special teams. That's not a good start.

The next obvious characteristic of the list is the lack of experience or success on the offensive side of the ball. We went with a gamble, an unknown, a risky choice for head coach and so rather than go out and hire an experienced veteran of an offensive coordinator, he decided to go with a gamble, an unknown, a risky Billy Napier. The same guy that called the plays for the last seven games, where our offense completely crumbled when faced with a halfway decent defense. Look at the Georgia Tech game, the Florida State game, the Virginia game, and finally the Nebraska game: what stood out as absolutely pathetic? Our offensive playcalling. Who was responsible? Napier. So he gets the job as Offensive Coordinator... excuse me for not pumping sunshine on this one, but I'm simply not buying the "but it was Bowden's offense" excuse. Napier had plenty of time to install new plays and formations and he just didn't get it done.

To be fair, we did see glimmers of hope with Napier at the head of the offense. The first half of the South Carolina game was filled with things we never saw from Bowden: power running with fullback lead-blocking, passing upfield on first and second down, quick hitting vertical pass plays like slants and posts, etc. Those things played to our offense's strengths (speed, runningbacks) and compensated for our weaknesses (linemen, quarterbacks.) For a minute there it looked like we were in for a complete offensive turnaround. Unfortunately, Napier didn't seem to learn the lesson of how effective those things were and they disappeared just as quickly as they had arrived. By the second half of the South Carolina game, we were back to our tunnel screen and double reverse loving ways, and that carried on to our Gator Bowl debacle against Nebraska. The Fun 'n Punt® offense was alive and well, with expected results.

Now, I should mention here that Swinney did mention in the press conference that there were going to be some offensive strategy changes in the off-season:
“Billy and I have worked together for four of the last five years,” said Swinney. “We have a good working relationship and the same philosophy, the same approach. We will have some changes next year. We will basically be a spread formation team. What will be different next year is that we will use the quarterback more in the running game. Billy is one of the fine young coaches in the nation. He will be a head coach some day.”
Call me a pessimist, but I just don't see much promise in this statement. I just don't see us coming out next year and running an Urban Meyer style shotgun option/veer and devastating the ACC. I wish we would, but something tells me it'll just be more of the same, except next year on third and long we'll have a scrambling quarterback who won't get sacked, but will run for 8 yards when we need 15. Yay.

Finally, it looks as if Swinney has caved to fan pressure about Brad Scott and taken the full responsibility of the offensive line away from him. Now he is only coaching guards and centers but as a consolation prize his son gets to move up to the big times in college football and coach the Wide Receivers. Hey, who knows, in just a few years he could be a head coach.

Labels: , ,

1.05.2009

What Dabo needs to do to avoid being Tommy 2.0


After watching our pitiful offensive performance in person at the Gator Bowl a few days ago, the only emotion I could feel was disappointment. I thought we had gotten rid of Tommy Bowden but the playcalling during that game made me feel like we just had a new, slightly improved Tommy Bowden with all the screen plays and reverses but without the last name. In fact, I hadn't seen such a pathetic effort by an offense since the Georgia Tech game of '07. It was just an extremely depressing game to watch, especially with the amazing effort our defense put forth.

The problem was clear: our offensive playcalling was simply braindead. What happened to the playcalling from the South Carolina game? Why had we reverted to the predictability of the Bowden era? We seemed to be following the same formula on every drive: Dive, screen or reverse, third and long pass attempt (sack,) punt. It was the Fun 'n punt of old.

Where was the passing on first down? Where were the quick hitting pass plays like slants and outs that had worked so well against South Carolina? Why did we run so many damn screens and east/west plays? As you can tell, it was an extremely frustrating debacle to witness.

What's even more frustrating is how the Clemson faithful have responded to the game in the same ol' typical way that absolves the coaches of any wrongdoing whatsoever. "Cullen Harper sucks" and "our offensive line is pathetic" are the main excuses. If our QB can't make decisions and our OL can't hold blocks, why then did we not run more "no brainer" pass plays like those I already mentioned? It doesn't take a great QB to run a TE pop pass, and it definitely doesn't take a great line, but it does gain yardage. If our line was so bad, why did we run so many plays that required such precise, excellent blocking as reverses and tunnel screens? The fans just don't seem to get those points. They just fall into their comfort zone of blaming certain players and absolving the coaches of any responsibility.

This brings me to my overall point: if Clemson wants to compete for the ACC title, Dabo Swinney needs to realize that his current offensive staff just can't get the job done. More specifically, he needs to hire an offensive coordinator that has a demonstrated record of success and knows how to put together a gameplan that uses the strengths of his team against the weaknesses of the opponent. Even more than that: we need an offensive coordinator with his own philosophy that is a complete departure from the failure of an offense that we couldn't seem to discard after Bowden's firing. If Napier remains at OC and our offense is not completely redesigned, we will see another frustrating year of what if's and could have been's in 2009.

Labels: , ,

12.15.2008

A video message from Dabo Swinney

http://clemsonathletics.tv/

This starts out kinda cool, but turns out to be an IPTAY fundraiser.

Labels: ,

12.06.2008

Vic Koenning on 3rd and Long

Football statisticians define third and long as third down and eight yards to go or greater. Vic Koenning loves to point to the work of statisticians (almost as much as Rob Spence loves "passing efficiency") so I decided to take a little deeper look into our defensive performance this year.

Draw your own conclusions, but to me the evidence is clear. If we were up against a good team and they needed to convert, they did. Bend but Don't Break was Broke.

Here's every third and long situation opposing offenses (of FBS teams) an the results:

Alabama 34, Clemson 10
Q13rd-15, Clem4710:49J. Wilson passed to G. Coffee to the left for 8 yard gainFG
Q43rd-9, Clem449:30J. Wilson passed to M. McCoy to the left for 24 yard gain1st
Q43rd-12, Clem127:40R. Upchurch rushed up the middle for 3 yard gainFG
Clemson 27, N.C. State 9
Q13rd-8, NCSt229:41R. Wilson rushed to the right for 9 yard gain1st
Q23rd-19, NCSt2215:00R. Wilson passed to A. Brown to the left for 3 yard gainPunt
Q23rd-11, NCSt269:41R. Wilson rushed up the middle for 5 yard lossPunt
Q33rd-12, Clem4312:41R. Wilson rushed to the right for 4 yard gain. Clem committed 15 yard penalty1st
Maryland 20, Clemson 17
Q13rd-9, Md339:44C. Turner passed to D. Scott to the left for 25 yard gain1st
Q13rd-9, Clem418:38C. Turner incomplete pass to the leftPunt
Q23rd-8, Clem1310:27C. Turner incomplete pass to the rightFG
Q23rd-12, Md216:02C. Turner incomplete pass to the rightPunt
Q23rd-12, Md12:22C. Turner passed to D. Scott to the right for 9 yard gainPunt
Q33rd-17, Md1313:36C. Turner incomplete pass to the rightPunt
Q33rd-10, Md495:13C. Turner incomplete pass to the rightPunt
Q43rd-11, Clem4314:16C. Turner incomplete pass down the middlePunt
Q43rd-8, Md424:25C. Turner passed to R. Tyler to the right for 10 yard gain1st
Wake Forest 12, Clemson 7
Q13rd-9, Clem2210:45R. Skinner rushed to the right for 21 yard gain1st
Q23rd-8, Wake313:45R. Skinner passed to C. Brinkman to the left for 7 yard gainPunt
Q23rd-12, Wake1310:47R. Skinner passed to M. Williams to the left for 24 yard gain1st
Q23rd-9, Wake389:15R. Skinner rushed to the right for 11 yard gain. Clem committed 15 yard penalty1st
Q23rd-9, Clem358:05R. Skinner incomplete pass to the rightPunt
Q43rd-10, 5014:40R. Skinner incomplete pass to the rightPunt
Q43rd-8, Clem1413:08R. Skinner incomplete pass to the rightFG
Q43rd-24, Wake89:35R. Skinner passed to D. Boldin down the middle for 28 yard gain1st
Georgia Tech 21, Clemson 17
Q23rd-16, GT143:39J. Dwyer rushed to the left for 31 yard gain1st
Q33rd-9, GT496:07J. Nesbitt incomplete pass down the middlePunt
Q33rd-8, GT250:51J. Nesbitt passed to D. Thomas to the right for 7 yard gainPunt
Q33rd-14, Clem4712:14J. Nesbitt incomplete pass down the middlePunt
Q43rd-14, GT368:56J. Nesbitt passed to D. Thomas to the right for 23 yard gain1st
Clemson 27, Boston Coll. 21
Q13rd-8, BC238:00C. Crane passed to M. Harris to the right for 1 yard gainPunt
Q13rd-8, BC324:36C. Crane incomplete pass down the middlePunt
Q23rd-10, Clem3914:15J. Haden rushed up the middle for 6 yard gainConvert
Q23rd-12, Clem379:10C. Crane incomplete pass to the rightPunt
Q33rd-9, BC1513:00C. Crane rushed to the right for 3 yard gainPunt
Q33rd-16, BC402:25C. Crane rushed up the middle for 5 yard gainPunt
Q43rd-10, BC2012:34C. Crane incomplete pass to the rightPunt
Q43rd-8, BC312:34C. Crane passed to J. McCluskey down the middle for 4 yard gainTOD
Florida St. 41, Clemson 27
Q13rd-11, FLSt3311:44C. Ponder incomplete pass to the rightPunt
Q13rd-12, Clem346:21C. Ponder incomplete pass to the rightPunt
Q23rd-11, Clem2113:48C. Ponder passed to C. Piurowski to the left for 2 yard gainFG
Q23rd-10, FLSt307:11C. Ponder incomplete pass down the middlePunt
Q33rd-13, Clem1411:11C. Ponder passed to C. Surrency down the middle for 14 yard touchdown. G. GaTD
Clemson 31, Duke 7
Q13rd-16, Duke469:40T. Lewis passed to C. Harris down the middle for 1 yard gainPunt
Q43rd-9, Clem332:41C. Sensabaugh intercepted Z. Asack for no gainINT
Clemson 13, Virginia 3
Q13rd-15, UVa286:35C. Peerman rushed up the middle for 3 yard lossPunt
Q23rd-8, UVa478:31M. Verica passed to K. Ogletree to the right for 13 yard gain1st
Q23rd-17, Clem176:02R. Randolph kicked a 34-yard field goalFG
Q23rd-10, UVa452:50M. Verica incomplete pass down the middlePunt
Q33rd-20, UVa371:35M. Verica passed to C. Koch down the middle for 19 yard gainPunt
Q43rd-8, Clem3212:57M. Verica passed to K. Ogletree down the middle for 7 yard gainTOD
Q43rd-9, UVa252:05D. McDaniel intercepted M. Verica for no gainINT
Clemson 31, South Carolina 14
Q13rd-20, 509:55C. Chancellor intercepted C. Smelley for no gainINT
Q13rd-9, SCar323:29C. Smelley incomplete pass to the leftTOD
Q33rd-9, Clem4712:55C. Smelley passed to J. Barnes to the left for 20 yard gain1st
Q33rd-10, SCar149:40C. Smelley passed to M. Davis to the right for 1 yard gainPunt
Q33rd-27, SCar230:52C. Smelley incomplete pass down the middlePunt
Q43rd-10, SCar396:52C. Smelley passed to B. Maddox to the left for 6 yard gainConvert
Q43rd-10, Clem164:34C. Chancellor intercepted C. Smelley for no gainINT


Labels: , ,

12.03.2008

Don't let the door hit you

...where the good Lord split you. That's all I have to say to former Clemson defensive coordinator Vic Koenning. He resigned from his defensive coordinator position yesterday and had this to say about his troubles:

They were being very noncommittal with our future, and we had already been through seven weeks of that," Koenning said. "With what we'd done on defense here, not just this year, but four years in a row, the best they've had over a span in the school's history by a lot. ... Over a four-year period there might be one or two defenses that have been better. For them not to be able to commit ... I just didn't think it was fair.
Who does this guy think he's kidding?

For those that didn't know, Vic Koenning ran a defense at Clemson that he called the "bend but don't break." This defense was designed to keep big plays from happening, and to tighten up when the opposing team made it into the red zone.

However, our inability to stop opposing teams from scoring earned Koenning's defense the title "Bend but don't win." Whenever we faced a team with a decent or better offense we were simply hopeless. They wouldn't put up monster numbers and get huge amounts of yardage (mostly,) but they also wouldn't have much trouble scoring points when they needed to. 3rd and long was especially brutal against our defense as teams seemed to convert with ease, especially in game-deciding situations. Here are a few examples:

Georgia Tech - 10:17 (4th Q)
1st-10, GT4010:17J. Dwyer rushed up the middle for 3 yard gain
2nd-7, GT439:50J. Nesbitt rushed up the middle for 7 yard loss
3rd-14, GT368:56J. Nesbitt passed to D. Thomas to the right for 23 yard gain

Wake Forest - 10:33 (4th Q)
1st-10, Wake2210:33B. Pendergrass rushed up the middle for no gain
2nd-10, Wake2210:10M. Williams rushed to the right for 9 yard loss
3rd-19, Wake139:45Wake committed 5 yard penalty
3rd-24, Wake89:35R. Skinner passed to D. Boldin down the middle for 28 yard gain

Maryland - 13:27 (4th Q)
1st-10, Clem4513:27D. Scott rushed to the right for 2 yard loss
2nd-12, Clem4713:07C. Turner passed to D. Oquendo down the middle for 11 yard gain
3rd-1, Clem3612:17D. Scott rushed up the middle for 2 yard gain
1st-10, Clem3411:31C. Turner incomplete pass to the left
2nd-10, Clem3411:31C. Turner passed to D. Oquendo to the left for 11 yard gain
1st-10, Clem2311:01C. Turner passed to D. Oquendo down the middle for 22 yard gain
1st-1, Clem110:41D. Scott rushed to the right for 1 yard touchdown. O. Egekeze made PAT
(no 3rd and long here, but still a game-winning drive)

So, as you can see from those game winning drives in those three games in just this past season, our Defense isn't exactly stellar. Sure they might look like giants on a stat sheet when you use averages and total yards and such, but if you're an opposing team and you need to put together a game winning drive, Koenning's defense will just lay right down and let you score.

I will say this though: if you have a team with a high powered offense that scores a ton of points (Texas Tech,) Vic Koenning might be your guy. His defense will slow down the other team, just make sure you stay two scores ahead at all times.

Labels: , ,

12.01.2008

Dabo Swinney Officially in as Head Coach

Here is the official announcement. Details are light at this point. Hopefully we'll find out some more at the press conference.

Now that it's a done deal, let me just outline my expectations for Dabo's first year at Clemson:

I have no expectations on the number of games we'll win or lose. Obviously as a fan I want us to win them all, but when considering a coach's performance objectively I don't care about statistics, not even W/L.

All I want from Dabo are these four things:
  1. Preparation - make sure we are ready for each opponent, armed with sound fundamentals and a good game plan
  2. Discipline - get the players mentally ready for the game so they play with toughness and purpose
  3. Adjustment - make good game time decisions and strategic adjustments
  4. Recruiting - keep bringing in the all-stars but additionally make sure we're strong at every position

Those are my expectations. I would hope that those would be the expectations of the fan base and administration as well, but who knows. I wish Dabo the best and I hope he can accomplish those four things. I will be anxiously watching, and of course sharing my thoughts.

Update:
After watching the press conference, it's damn near impossible to remain objective with this guy. He can really win you over, and hopefully that will translate over to recruiting and motivating the players.

Dabo gave me something to add to the expectations column though:
"My goals will be simple: to recruit the best Athletes we can possibly recruit, to graduate those players, and to win championships."
Well, we shall see.

Update 2:

Oh no. He just said we're not going to make any major changes. "We have a good system" was the quote. Damnit. Damnit damnit damnit.

I'm holding out hope that he was just using coach-speak there and he's really going to fundamentally change the offense, but boy I'm scared he's going to turn out to be Tommy 2.0, the Fun 'N Punt returns.

Labels: , ,

Clemson press conference today at 5

FYI everyone, there will be a press conference today at 5 PM from the Clemson Athletic Department. Rumors abound that Dabo has been signed on as the next head coach on a 4 year deal for $1 million a year. Those details seem a little to bland and obvious to actually be true, but who knows.

I must admit, I am having a negative reaction to this. Maybe it's the burn from 2003 and the way Bowden's contract was extended. Either way, as much as I like Dabo my instincts are telling me this is bad news.

Labels: , ,

11.30.2008

Rumors are Swirling: The job is Dabo's

Dabo to be signed Monday is the rumor floating around the internets this morning. Established news outlets (as the link demonstrates) as well as blogs and messageboards are all buzzing about it.

Me, I'm disappointed. These types of decisions should not be made at the height of an emotionally charged weekend and at the end of an emotionally charged 7 weeks. These decisions should be made deliberately based on reason and logic. Unfortunately, it wouldn't surprise me that these rumors are true, as our last three major coaching decisions were made in similar knee-jerk fashion:

-2007 situation: Tommy Bowden flirts with signing on at Arkansas
-Knee jerk reaction: Terry Don Phillips offers Bowden a contract extension, raise, and buyout rather than firing him and hiring Paul Johnson

-2004 situation: Fight at the end of SC game draws attention of national media
-Knee jerk reaction: Terry Don Phillips forbids Clemson from accepting any Bowl Bids rather than disciplining the actual players responsible, allows South Carolina to keep us from going to a Bowl not by actually beating us, but by starting a fight.

-2003 situation: Tommy Bowden should have been fired after Wake Forest meltdown with a talent-stacked Clemson team, instead it is proclaimed "no decisions will be made until a thorough evaluation of the entire season takes place." Bowden proceeds to lead the Tigers to a strong finish by beating FSU and blowing out South Carolina.
-Knee jerk reaction: The Monday after the South Carolina game Terry Don Phillips announces a contract extension, raise, and buyout for a coach that used the same group of talented players to get blown out by Wake Forest and then beat an extremely good FSU team.

Obviously, those three knee jerk reactions didn't turn out so well. I hope this one (if it's true) turns out better, but my gut feeling says otherwise.

Labels: , ,

11.29.2008

Dabo Swinney is a better coach than Steve Spurrier

Hey, Steve Spurrier said it himself:

(right around the 6 minute mark.)

That's a pretty ringing endorsement.

Labels: , ,

Should Clemson have Hired Paul Johnson?



Last year, after another year of disappointment for the Bowden-led Clemson Tigers, there was a lot of debate on these here internets over Tommy Bowden's coaching status, and what should be done about it. Some people thought he should be kept on at Clemson and some people thought he should be replaced. I thought that Bowden should be immediately fired and replaced by Paul Johnson. I can safely say that I was alone in this regard, and even called insane for it.

Terry Don Phillips (who's opinion actually counts) thought that his mediocre 9-year performance actually warranted a raise, contract extension, and $4 million buyout. We got stuck with Bowden again, and Georgia Tech made a move on Paul Johnson after firing Chan Gailey. In the minds of the fans and the pundits, these actions turned Clemson into the preseason #9 team in the nation and the ACC favorites hands down, and turned Tech into somewhat of a laughing stock of a talentless, coachless football team.

Well, the regular season is over so let's take a look at the results, shall we?

Clemson:
After a dismal 3-3 start with embarrassing losses to Alabama, Maryland, and Wake Forest, Clemson finally made the correct action and fired Tommy Bowden. We then appointed Dabo Swinney as interim head coach and finished the last 6 games with a 4 and 2 record, ending the season at 7-5 and earning bowl eligibility. Our only quality win was against Boston College (which is a stretch) and we did beat our in-state rival. We finish the season with a huge question mark as to who is going to be our Head Coach, and a huge disappointment in staying home again for the ACC championship game then going to some low tier bowl in late December. Quite the fall from preseason expectations.

Georgia Tech:
The Yellowjackets only lost one game out of their first seven blowing everyone's expectations completely out of the water. Their one loss was on the road at Virginia Tech in a 20-17 nailbiter. After that great start they dropped a couple of odd games to Virginia and North Carolina and ended the year by upsetting their in-state rival, the preseason #1 Georgia Bulldogs. They finished the year 9-3 and an inch away from going to the ACC championship as VT again used a field goal margin of victory to keep Georgia Tech from claiming the ACC coastal division. Along the way they picked up quality wins against Clemson, Florida State, Boston College, and Georgia. They will end up going to a mid-tier bowl like the Gator or Peach (Chik-fil-A.)

Now remember, this is a Clemson team that started the season with a coach in his 10th year, with supposedly tons of talent and supposedly a "mad scientist" offensive coordinator. This is a Georgia Tech team that started the season with a coach in his very first year in "big time" college football and first year at Tech with what everybody thought at the time was a talentless team and a hair-brained offensive system.

It's easy to see who was right. We should have hired Paul Johnson. I just wish there was some way Clemson could steal him away in the next few weeks.

Labels: , ,

Clemson beats USCjr 31-14

The clock has just reached 00 and Dabo Swinney has just reached 4-2. The playcalling today was leaps and bounds ahead of what it has been in earlier Swinney-coached games (and obviously therefore much better than any Bowden coached games.) We ran a lot of quick hitting pass plays on first and second downs and didn't find ourselves with many third and long situations. We controlled the ball and had very few mistakes, except of course for a few Harperisms like the a fumble deep in our own territory which led to a gamecock touchdown.

I must say I'm impressed with Swinney at this point. I think he's ready to be the offensive coordinator of the Clemson Tigers. He's had 6 games at the controls and he's done some things that I really didn't like but he has learned and improved and today, when all the chips were down, he performed. We saw very few trick plays today and a very good game plan. The results speak for themselves.

It did help that we were playing against the SEC's most inept offense though. I think Smelley had more completions to Clemson Tigers than Harper did. The gamecocks supposedly had a good defense, but Florida and others showed that to be false. Also, the second half was pretty disappointing after the huge lead we jumped out to in the first. I know we still won the game but I do hate to see coaches go into a shell when they get a lead... against better competition that can be deadly.

After today, I really hope we can keep Dabo in some manner, but I still don't think he should be the head coach. Maybe he will be and he will prove me wrong... honestly I wouldn't hate it if he got the job.

Labels: , ,

11.26.2008

Clemson Coaching Prediction: Foster/Swinney

I've got a feeling that we're going to hear some news about the Clemson head coach position pretty soon now. I think it's going to happen shortly after the USCjr game, possibly Monday afternoon. Here's what I'm going with:

Head Coach and Defensive Coordinator: Bud Foster



Assistant Head Coach and Offensive Coordinator: Dabo Swinney



Instead of going through and explaining my reasoning for this at great detail, I'll just keep it simple: I think this is what Terry Don Phillips is going for, and I think he's going to make it happen. I also believe this will be a great coaching staff for Clemson football.

Labels: , ,

11.18.2008

Strike one off the Coaching short list

Muschamp locked down at Texas.

Well, looks like we're not getting Muschamp. From what I've heard my UGA buddies say, it's no big loss. Time to lock down Bud Foster and make sure he can bring in a good offensive mind.

Labels: , ,

11.15.2008

Two and Two




I wasn't able to watch the game today, but it turns out that the Tigers downed Duke 31-7.

I've seen several articles on the intarweb that mention how we're "finally playing like the team we were supposed to be." Well... that's just dumb. Come on people, let's not forget that we were playing Duke. Really. Duke. Also, take a look at the team that killed us last week, FSU, getting beaten up by a not-so-stellar BC team. Let's not get overly excited here.

Unfortunately I didn't get to see the kind of plays we ran but I'd love to find out if someone out there would like to comment on it. I'm hoping we saw less trick plays, reverses, etc and more fundamental stuff like quick hitting slants and downhill running.

Regardless, Dabo is 2-2 now as head coach and this game proves that he can handle inferior teams properly. Let's see if he continues to prove that over the next two weeks.

Labels: , ,

11.08.2008

Florida State Wrapup


Well, in Dabo Swinney's third game, the FSU seminoles downed the Tigers 41-27.

Up until this point I've been very optimistic about Dabo and I've even said that I think he would make a good head coach, with the preferred situation being that we hire Bud Foster as the head coach and keep Dabo Swinney on as the Offensive Coordinator.

After this game, I'm not so sure. First off, yet again our defense proved completely incapable of stopping a decent offense, especially down the stretch. The "bend but don't win" just doesn't work and we need to bring in a guy like Foster or Muschamp who will deploy an aggressive, in your face defense that dictates to the offense how the game is going to go.

However, the offense is still the main problem, just like it was under Bowden. Tonight we ran far too many trick plays and lateral plays, running back and forth across the field on triple reverses and lateral passes and not making any forward progress against a defense that has the most team speed in the ACC. That's just bad strategy, plain and simple. Not to mention the failed screen pass that turned into an interception return for a touchdown.

I like Dabo as a man and as a recruiter, but I'm just not convinced that he's enough of a departure from Tommy Bowden to be a good offensive coach for Clemson. Tonight we ran on seemingly every first down, and it was either a reverse or a dive. There are a lot more gaps to attack than either the 1 or the 9. We need someone who can run a fundamental, pro-style, SEC type offense that uses power, fundamentals, and skill to outplay and outsmart the opponent.

So now I really don't know who should be the head coach. Hopefully a Foster or a Muschamp could bring in a great offensive coordinator. Maybe Dabo will redeem himself and stop calling such a predictable offense. I hope so, because we're not going to win many games by putting ourselves in 3rd and long situations with a shoddy line and a crappy quarterback.

Labels: , ,

11.01.2008

What a weird day of Football

The Dabo Swinney lead Clemson Tigers came out and got a win vs. Boston College, the first since they joined the ACC. I'm starting to like this Dabo guy but I still don't like our defense. Why we can't stop the other team late in the game is just beyond me. Bend but Don't Break... is broke. We went up 17-0 and then found ourselves down 21-17 in the fourth? How does that happen?

Anyway I didn't see the game so I won't be going into any in-depth breakdown; maybe so if I can catch a replay on CSS or something. I'm glad we won for our players and for Dabo.

Meanwhile Paul Johnson and the Yellow Jackets put down Florida State. I can't say I expected that before this year started but Johnson has made a lot more progress than I thought possible back then, so I was expecting it this weekend. It would be ironically hilarious if Johnson won the ACC in year 1 when Bowden couldn't do it in 10.

My other favorite team, the Georgia Bulldogs, crapped all over themselves today down in the WLOCP. What is it about Jacksonville that makes Georgia play so bad? The refs did help Florida out a good bit in the early part of that game, but that's no excuse really. Stafford and the offense just couldn't get it done today. The defense wasn't horrible but they didn't come up with any big plays either, so it was just an all around F out there.

Now it's halftime of the Texas vs Texas Tech game and Texas is going down about the same as Georgia. They're just lolligagging all over the place, especially on offense. I think they had the ball for 3 minutes in the first half, and yet somehow their defense has held TT to 20 points. That Muschamp is pretty impressive.

Labels: , , ,

10.30.2008

Things are looking good in Tiger Town

The guys over at Block-C have a news update for us today. Basically, we have CJ Spiller back, Dabo has been discussing football and life with Danny Ford, and we're working on a much more aggressive offense. Good news all around.

I'm starting to feel like we might have a big game this weekend. Like a Georgia Tech in 2006 type weekend. I don't know, but it'll be fun to watch.

Labels: , ,

10.23.2008

Bad News Thursday

Two quick items today:

1) Humphries Suffers Torn ACL, Out for the Year - I hate linking to Tardnet, but they've got the scoop this time. Our OL was getting healthier, but we've just suffered a major setback. Hopefully somebody can step it up. I think after Dabo's had the offense in practice for 2 full weeks he'll be able to get them into better situations and set them up for success, rather than failure. This will make it appear to the laymen that the OL is doing much better.

2) Rich Rod is being rumored as the next Clemson coach - Oh please, please no. Please! Rich Rod is just another Tommy Bowden as far as I'm concerned. He's got to have the best athletes on the field to win the game and sometimes even then he gets out-coached. PLEASE no more gimmick coaches!!!

PS - Mickey Plyler is a complete douchenozzle This type of writing and logic FAIL is why I refer to that place as "Tardnet."

Labels: , ,

10.21.2008

Muschamp Followup

If you recall from one of my earlier posts on AntiBowden, I made this statement about prospective coach Will Muschamp:

Texas has a HUGE task coming up. They face Oklahoma on Oct 11 and Missouri on Oct 18. They aren't favored to win either of those games. Let's see how Muschamp's defense performs and what kind of grit they have. They might not necessarily win, but it's how they play that you should be concerned with. Are there halftime adjustments made? Does the defense look like they're prepared?


Well now we find Texas the #1 team in the country after defeating both Oklahoma and Missouri, something that nobody expected them to do just a few weeks ago. Unfortunately I was not able to watch either game, but from reading the post game write-ups it appears that Muschamp's defense was up to the challenge. Oklahoma gave them the most problems and scored a lot of points but when it comes down to it, the Longhorns D did what it had to do to win the game. They made the adjustments that were needed, and stopped Oklahoma when they needed to.

Missouri was another story as they were simply embarrassed all day. So much so that at halftime they had only scored 3 points. They did end up scoring 31 points total, but the game was never close. Overall: A+, great job Muschamp

So if you're like me and you want to see a great defensive coordinator as our next head coach at Clemson, you have to ask yourself: Do you want Bud Foster, who would jump through hoops to come to Clemson, or do you want Muschamp, who reacted to Tommy Bowden being fired after 10 years of failure with "I guess that's just how college football is these days."? I'm still leaning towards Foster, but Muschamp has illustrated this year that he has the talent to get it done.

Labels: , ,